Coloured paper edges
I saw these in Waterstones the other day, and they really caught my eye. Coloured pages edges - matching the full colour block on the cover. The coloured edges turning the book into these blocks of solid colour are very eye catching and effective.
I know you've got to do whatever you can to sell a book these days - so it's pretty much any gimmick goes... but I like these. Shame the cover treatment and the type are nothing to write home about.
(Excuse the shitty pictures)
Monday, January 16, 2012
Famous people with vinyl
This did the rounds a good bit ago... but it's good fun and there are some amazing pictures here.
Sunday, October 23, 2011
The iPod is ten years old. I am pretty surprised it is so young, which is no doubt a testiment to how completely it has integrated itself with the world, to the point of being the ubiquitess device on which music is played.
I didn't get one for ages as I had commited pretty whole heartidly to Mini-disc. I still have 2 draws full of mini-discs. See, with mini-discs I could record my records straight onto the same device I would carry around with me. I could also plug it into my computer at work and record radio shows off the internet... especially if I recorded it at half quality, as that would double the recoardable time to 148 minutes... So I didn't need an iPod... I'd just have to spend all my time recording records to a computer and then trimming or splitting the recorded stream and saving it as mp3 etc. Chore.
But it seems that the rest of the world didn't really have these concerns. The idea of recording your music from one format onto another is pretty much gone now to the general public. iPods fueled the increasing availablity of music as a computer format - mp3, m4a, aac, flac. Initially people would see an iPod as a way of carrying around their cd collections, which they would load up on to their computer, and then shift on to their iPod. Then as the iTunes store took off, people found they didn't need to buy the cds anymore. And then also people found that everyone was giving away music files all over the place which they could grab easily.
So then lo and behold, ten years later how people buy and consume and store their music collection has completely changed to become the organising of computer files. You don't need to construct a home made musical compelations by playing the music into a recording device. You have lists of your music in clear pixels on a screen, and the ability to create spaces for you to drag the titles to, and re-order them how you want. Or even create 'smart' folders, which can be populated purely by recognition of artist name, title, style any particular tag you choose.
"Nobody thinks of albums anymore, anyway. People think of playlists and mixes. We'll still sell albums as artists put them out, but for most consumers of popular music, we think they'll more likely buy single tracks that they like. And then they'll organise them into cusomized playlists in their computers and on their iPods."
Steve Jobs 2003
But I'm begining to think that iPods themselves are nearing the end of their time. Smart phones are standardly used as portable music devices for all who have them. These are only going to get cheaper and more used. And in doing that, the need for iPods as a stand alone portable music player is getting unnecessary. Yeah they can make them smaller for exercise usage, but the development potential there is pretty limited, so they just become cheaper and tackier. Then eventually all your computer files will just be available in the 'cloud' or wherever, so all you'll need is some connection device to be able to access all your music, and then carrying around a box full of music files will become too much.
iPod, your days are numbered.
I do look back with fond nostalgia at having a bunch of tapes or mini-discs in a your bag. You know four TDK-D90's or 5 mini-discs was always enough music to venture outside with.
Saturday, April 03, 2010
William Bassinski.
I've been listening to a fair bit of music through awful in built iMac speakers recently. It's been surprisingly pleasant as long as you don't try to listen to anything dynamic. I'm doing this whilst stuck in a small office on my own, and so it's nice to have some ambient noise to keep me company. So I've been rinsing the ambient and classical sounds you can find on Last.fm. And very nice too.
One person I came across whose really rocked my world is William Bassinski. I'd had one of his tunes on for about 10 minutes, before I checked how long it was and realised I was only a quarter of the way though. I then glanced at some comments beneath the player, and found people complaining that it was just a loop... Now I'd had it on fairly quiet, and as I mentioned, on the shitty iMac speakers, so I hadn't really realised what I was listening to, and that it was pretty much a loop.
The track in question was D|P 3 off The Disintegration Loops II. What you hear is a warm, orchestral sound with two notes from a horn that loops over 10/12 seconds. Over time though sections of the sound start to degrade. This degradation is pretty imperceptible at first, but after 20 or so minutes is noticeable. The degradation gives the loop more rhythm, more obvious repetition and also makes the end of the loop (if that's what you choose to mark as the end) sound like a crunching finale. So every 10/12 seconds you get a crunching, collapsing finale. You start listening out - waiting - for the next noticeable degradation. How much will it lose next? How will it grow? But the degradation can take so long that there is no real change... and then something will go, something will give that kind of just destroys you. Very melodramatic this obviously. But as its an endless loop, going over a long time, your mind starts to rely on it, you start to know it and expect it. Instinctively, not mentally, I'd doubt you're aware of every nuonce of sound. But when something does go it can feel very sudden and dramatic. Which in a 40 minute piece of music built on a 10/12 second loop, is pretty amazing. I can't tell you what happens (as in I can't describe, not I'm not going to tell you), but something happens around 32 minutes 47 seconds, that is really crushing... I'm afraid you can't skip straight to it, it wouldn't work...
The tracks were made when William Bassinski was archiving some old audio loops he had on tape to digital. The archiving itself ended up destroying the audio itself. So what we are hearing is the destruction of the audio recording, from its continuous playing. And when the track ends, we 'know' that the original sound which was playing, is effectively dead. So we are listening to sound dying... and it sounds like it too. Dying with great dignity and poise it is too.
I've been listening to a fair bit of music through awful in built iMac speakers recently. It's been surprisingly pleasant as long as you don't try to listen to anything dynamic. I'm doing this whilst stuck in a small office on my own, and so it's nice to have some ambient noise to keep me company. So I've been rinsing the ambient and classical sounds you can find on Last.fm. And very nice too.
One person I came across whose really rocked my world is William Bassinski. I'd had one of his tunes on for about 10 minutes, before I checked how long it was and realised I was only a quarter of the way though. I then glanced at some comments beneath the player, and found people complaining that it was just a loop... Now I'd had it on fairly quiet, and as I mentioned, on the shitty iMac speakers, so I hadn't really realised what I was listening to, and that it was pretty much a loop.
The track in question was D|P 3 off The Disintegration Loops II. What you hear is a warm, orchestral sound with two notes from a horn that loops over 10/12 seconds. Over time though sections of the sound start to degrade. This degradation is pretty imperceptible at first, but after 20 or so minutes is noticeable. The degradation gives the loop more rhythm, more obvious repetition and also makes the end of the loop (if that's what you choose to mark as the end) sound like a crunching finale. So every 10/12 seconds you get a crunching, collapsing finale. You start listening out - waiting - for the next noticeable degradation. How much will it lose next? How will it grow? But the degradation can take so long that there is no real change... and then something will go, something will give that kind of just destroys you. Very melodramatic this obviously. But as its an endless loop, going over a long time, your mind starts to rely on it, you start to know it and expect it. Instinctively, not mentally, I'd doubt you're aware of every nuonce of sound. But when something does go it can feel very sudden and dramatic. Which in a 40 minute piece of music built on a 10/12 second loop, is pretty amazing. I can't tell you what happens (as in I can't describe, not I'm not going to tell you), but something happens around 32 minutes 47 seconds, that is really crushing... I'm afraid you can't skip straight to it, it wouldn't work...
The tracks were made when William Bassinski was archiving some old audio loops he had on tape to digital. The archiving itself ended up destroying the audio itself. So what we are hearing is the destruction of the audio recording, from its continuous playing. And when the track ends, we 'know' that the original sound which was playing, is effectively dead. So we are listening to sound dying... and it sounds like it too. Dying with great dignity and poise it is too.
Monday, March 22, 2010
Good, good friend Duncan Brown sent me a note saying he enjoyed the Rainbow of books down below, and pointing me towards these stunning images/sculptures made of books by Paul Octavious.
There are two sets within his project section. #1 - Book collection; where he has created firstly numbers and then a few random shapes and monsters out of a pile of carefully colour co-ordinated books. And the #2 Stacked; where he has made very simple shapes/piles/towers out of a collection of books (from one series), often tying them together.
The photography is very delicate and neat, and the sculptures look lovely. Perfectly stacked and arranged, but using well worn, used books and string. They look like a quick, fun pile, but must have taken ages to build. These are gorgeously simple, but amazingly effective and stunning images. They look like mini Christo's.
I've not posted all the images. Do go and see them all, as they are all wonderful.
Thanks Duncan x.
There are two sets within his project section. #1 - Book collection; where he has created firstly numbers and then a few random shapes and monsters out of a pile of carefully colour co-ordinated books. And the #2 Stacked; where he has made very simple shapes/piles/towers out of a collection of books (from one series), often tying them together.
The photography is very delicate and neat, and the sculptures look lovely. Perfectly stacked and arranged, but using well worn, used books and string. They look like a quick, fun pile, but must have taken ages to build. These are gorgeously simple, but amazingly effective and stunning images. They look like mini Christo's.
I've not posted all the images. Do go and see them all, as they are all wonderful.
Thanks Duncan x.
Wednesday, March 17, 2010
This is nice. It's good designing books, it makes me look up from a screen of code and see the beautiful things people are creating.
This came from (but was not made by) Coralie Bickford-Smith, who is a senior cover designer at Penguin Books.
This came from (but was not made by) Coralie Bickford-Smith, who is a senior cover designer at Penguin Books.
Speaking of things that make you drool. I came across this yesterday too (it's amazing I got any work done yesterday).
I saw this cover on the excellent The Oxen of the Sun blog, which covers all things book design. As I design a book a year at the moment, I like to check out the latest book design fetish items a bit, and dream about making more books.
Nabokov's The Original of Laura was the book he was working on when he died. He said he didn't want it published, but his son kept hold of it, and seems to have allowed it to be published. They have done an amazing job. Chip Kidd was the designer, which after a bit of research doesn't seem like a surprise, as he seems to be the Johnathan Ive of book design.
Nabokov apparently wrote his books on index cards. This book has been published with a photo of each of the original index cards on each page, and then a printed text version below it.
The back of the index card is displayed on the reverse of the page, so you get pencil smudges and notes etc. PLUS, the index cards are perforated too, so in theory you could pop them all out and have an original version of the book as it was written.
Plus the cover is amazing. Very understated... very black. Another geeky purchase I feel.
I saw this cover on the excellent The Oxen of the Sun blog, which covers all things book design. As I design a book a year at the moment, I like to check out the latest book design fetish items a bit, and dream about making more books.
Nabokov's The Original of Laura was the book he was working on when he died. He said he didn't want it published, but his son kept hold of it, and seems to have allowed it to be published. They have done an amazing job. Chip Kidd was the designer, which after a bit of research doesn't seem like a surprise, as he seems to be the Johnathan Ive of book design.
Nabokov apparently wrote his books on index cards. This book has been published with a photo of each of the original index cards on each page, and then a printed text version below it.
The back of the index card is displayed on the reverse of the page, so you get pencil smudges and notes etc. PLUS, the index cards are perforated too, so in theory you could pop them all out and have an original version of the book as it was written.
Plus the cover is amazing. Very understated... very black. Another geeky purchase I feel.
I came accross this again the other day. A turntable that plays with a lazer* - ELP Laser Turntable. As a vinyl junkie, this thing sounds like a great idea. Play your records forever without them getting any damage due to usage. Might be a fun purchase. However it costs about £7000 (rising up to £9000+). So probably a bit much, for a 'bit of fun'.
In slightly related note, I think I've just bust my iPod. I'm trying to mentally blame the kids, as I was on the phone to them at the time I dropped it... but basically it's my fault.
I'm feeling decidely non-plused about this. My iPod has been my main travel form of music for the last 3 years. It has lots of good shit on it that I've either downloaded (mixes, free tracks, podcasts etc) or my vinyl that I've recorded. If it is bust, there's a high chance that I've lost a lot of that stuff. So I should probably be a bit more fussed really... plus they don't come cheap.
But some how it feels like, this was bound to happen sooner or later. And losing mp3s doesn't really feel like losing anything important. I'm sure I can find most of the bits again if I need to... but more than likely I will never remember half of the things I've lost.
I'm basically coming round to the idea that I am a record collector... if I try hard I'd say I was a music collector, but the fact that I don't really feel I have a piece of music, unless it's on vinyl, makes me a record collector.
I was listening to Last.fm yesterday and came accross some amazing music I'd never heard of. Really lovely, interesting, deleicate classical stuff. I was listening to Steve Reich radio, so I was hearing lost of stuff made by people who'd studies classic music and had then created their own avant garde style. I heard an amazing piece by Terry Riley called 'In C'. This is a 45 minute classical piece, similar (maybe) to Steve Reich's 'Music for 18 musicians'. Lots of simple loops, played by orchestral instruments. The loops go in and out of each other, and change too. Very plink plonky, very sweet. Very nice.
I found I could buy this online, for really not very much (69p or £6.49 at most), but it felt decidedly unsatisfactory to own this wonderful, beautiful piece of music just a file on my computer.
I did however also find it on the excellent Amber Green shop site, as the original UK release 1971 version. This is no doubt going to be split in the middle - faded out at the end of side one and the faded in on side two. But it is going to fell very precious and very beautiful. And if I ever get round to sitting down and listening to the whole thing, on vinyl, I think it will feel very special and proper.
I don't know what this feeling will be.. probably a geeky, smug, self satisfaction... because in theory any response in me should be triggered by the music, not the format. But I guess this is why I am becoming a record collector, rather than a music collector. But hey, I collect some damn good, beautiful, funky, soulful, heavy, deep, banging, classic records.
* Note: I know Lazer should probably be spelt with an S rather than a Z. But if ever there was a word which desirved a Z in it is must be Lazer...
In slightly related note, I think I've just bust my iPod. I'm trying to mentally blame the kids, as I was on the phone to them at the time I dropped it... but basically it's my fault.
I'm feeling decidely non-plused about this. My iPod has been my main travel form of music for the last 3 years. It has lots of good shit on it that I've either downloaded (mixes, free tracks, podcasts etc) or my vinyl that I've recorded. If it is bust, there's a high chance that I've lost a lot of that stuff. So I should probably be a bit more fussed really... plus they don't come cheap.
But some how it feels like, this was bound to happen sooner or later. And losing mp3s doesn't really feel like losing anything important. I'm sure I can find most of the bits again if I need to... but more than likely I will never remember half of the things I've lost.
I'm basically coming round to the idea that I am a record collector... if I try hard I'd say I was a music collector, but the fact that I don't really feel I have a piece of music, unless it's on vinyl, makes me a record collector.
I was listening to Last.fm yesterday and came accross some amazing music I'd never heard of. Really lovely, interesting, deleicate classical stuff. I was listening to Steve Reich radio, so I was hearing lost of stuff made by people who'd studies classic music and had then created their own avant garde style. I heard an amazing piece by Terry Riley called 'In C'. This is a 45 minute classical piece, similar (maybe) to Steve Reich's 'Music for 18 musicians'. Lots of simple loops, played by orchestral instruments. The loops go in and out of each other, and change too. Very plink plonky, very sweet. Very nice.
I found I could buy this online, for really not very much (69p or £6.49 at most), but it felt decidedly unsatisfactory to own this wonderful, beautiful piece of music just a file on my computer.
I did however also find it on the excellent Amber Green shop site, as the original UK release 1971 version. This is no doubt going to be split in the middle - faded out at the end of side one and the faded in on side two. But it is going to fell very precious and very beautiful. And if I ever get round to sitting down and listening to the whole thing, on vinyl, I think it will feel very special and proper.
I don't know what this feeling will be.. probably a geeky, smug, self satisfaction... because in theory any response in me should be triggered by the music, not the format. But I guess this is why I am becoming a record collector, rather than a music collector. But hey, I collect some damn good, beautiful, funky, soulful, heavy, deep, banging, classic records.
* Note: I know Lazer should probably be spelt with an S rather than a Z. But if ever there was a word which desirved a Z in it is must be Lazer...
Thursday, March 11, 2010
More books and rainbows. This time c/o Holly Rose from some publishing conference in Chicago last month.